Worse than that: it makes the environment more hostile for leaks in the future. Journalists and leakers are free to publish not just because the courts protect free speech, but because the overall climate allows it. Traditionally, leaks against an administration could depend on support from the opposition, or at least on the opposition saying the harm to freedom of speech and of information incurred by going after the leakers was greater than the benefit of plugging the hole. Wikileaks has taken leaking to such an anarchistic extreme that the whole political establishment is turned against it. If Julian Assange does eventually end up in the US charged with something, it will be a chilling precedent. This is also significant as far as the courts are concerned: judges are not immune to public opinion and public passions. Why do you think they tread on eggshells when National Security is at stake?
Don't get me wrong: leaking classified information, even if it is against our national security interests, can absolutely be justified. The people who leaked the details of Bush's
No comments:
Post a Comment